feat: support Dust tree by age #413
Conversation
|
|
||
| // 按照指定格式格式化为字符串 | ||
| local_datetime.format("%Y%m%dT%H:%M:%S").to_string() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe: "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S"
Also lets get rid of the comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I will resubmit the code after testing the performance and fix this together
I will test my submitted performance test, if the test is OK, I will notify you to help me review the code. |
wugeer
force-pushed
the
feature_show_by_mtime
branch
from
300565c to
8770645
Compare
Hello, Tests with hyperfine show that this PR means we are running ~ 4% slower than the v1.0.0 release. I'm not sure if the performance test results are okay. Here are my test results. |
wugeer
force-pushed
the
feature_show_by_mtime
branch
from
8770645 to
3ee3c16
Compare
|
I think this is sensible, I just want to sleep on it for a bit. |
My hyperfine tests show this branch is about 4% faster ! Either way its fine, I'm looking for drops of >10% before I get nervous. |
|
Why did you choose the flag |
hello， I chose randomly from the remaining single-letter parameters. I originally wanted to use -t but it was already taken. Do you have any other good suggestions? @bootandy |
|
I don't have other suggestions, I'll research some other tools to see if anyone has anything similar, but we'll go with -m if I can't find anything. |
Background
Dust tree by age #385
Add a new feature to dust to show the tree by age
Full Changelogs
Issue Reference
fix: Dust tree by age #385
Test Result
dust help command output
cargo test run test results
show by accesstime
show by modifiedtime
show by createdtime